MARSAD
Methodology/ Minimum Viable Bank

The floor of services that must keep running, declared and signed.

Not the bank's full offering. Not a promise of availability. The set of services where "down" is not an acceptable state, declared on paper.

What it is

The Minimum Viable Bank (MVB) is the bank's declared floor, the services and supporting capabilities that must remain available under foreseeable stress, including the days when the surrounding systems are not. The MVB is a subset of the IBS register, not a duplicate of it.

It exists to give the bank, the regulator, and the customer the same answer to a simple question: if a meaningful chunk of your environment goes dark, what stays on?

Why it matters

SAMA's operational-resilience framework expects banks to have thought concretely about minimum operating capability. The MVB is the artefact that makes that thinking testable, once you've declared a floor, you can drill against it, find the gaps, and close them before the next stress event.

Internally, the MVB also forces useful conversations. Which sovereign-mandated services bypass the gating? What design ambitions sit behind the floor? Which services are running on a single supplier with no continuity plan? The declaration process surfaces all of this.

How MARSAD frames it

MARSAD treats the MVB as a scoped, recurring declaration rather than a static document:

Sovereign mandate, recognised. Some services (SARIE, SADAD, SPAN, mada, IPS, Etimad) are mandated by SAMA and are operationally non-negotiable for any participating bank. MARSAD recognises these as a distinct class so the MVB conversation doesn't waste cycles re-litigating their inclusion.

What customers see

Related methodology